An eight-quarter review of FFS SNF discharge patterns, destination concentration, and FSHR performance across a 12-hospital health system across the Central Florida, Tampa Bay, and Alabama Baptist markets — across Orange, Osceola, Seminole, Lake, Brevard, Indian River, Pinellas, and Alabama Jefferson/Shelby/Walker/Talladega counties.
Orlando Health operates the Central Florida, Tampa Bay, and Alabama Baptist markets, spanning 12 hospitals across Central Florida, Tampa Bay, and Alabama Baptist counties. Its post-acute discharge picture is one of meaningful scale — 3,418 Medicare fee-for-service patients flowing across 188 SNF destinations over eight quarters — with limited cross-hospital coordination and no unified preferred-network infrastructure to manage FSHR performance systematically.
Over eight quarters (CMS Medicare FFS Claims: 2025 Q1 – 2025 Q4), Orlando Health hospitals collectively discharged 3,418 fee-for-service Medicare patients to skilled nursing facilities, reaching 188 distinct SNF destinations across Central Florida, Tampa Bay, and Alabama Baptist markets. Orlando Health Orlando Regional Medical Center leads the system in post-acute volume with 1,380 patients across 165 SNF destinations — the single largest Orlando Health post-acute relationship set in the analysis. Orlando Health South Lake Hospital is the second-highest volume hospital in the system, contributing 436 FFS SNF patients.
Florida state SNF utilization average is 16.5% (FFS). What the data reveals is a system-wide FSHR elevation and destination fragmentation story: across 12 active hospitals, 3,418 patients are distributed to 188 SNFs, most operating without a structured performance framework or preferred-network accountability from Orlando Health care teams.
Within Orlando Health’s existing discharge patterns is a structural starting point for coordination: 77 SNFs already serve two or more Orlando Health hospitals simultaneously. These shared facilities are the organic preferred network — facilities that Orlando Health hospitals have collectively chosen through discharge patterns without any formal coordination. Puzzle Healthcare’s role is to formalize that organic network, extend its reach, and make FSHR performance systematically measurable and accountable.
The 15 priority SNF targets identified in this analysis — facilities with elevated FSHR rates appearing across multiple Orlando Health hospitals — represent the highest-impact starting cohort for an embedded clinical program. Together they account for significant patient volume and carry FSHR rates meaningfully above the system-wide average of 42.1%.
Orlando Health operates 12 acute-care hospitals across the Central Florida, Tampa Bay, and Alabama Baptist markets — a dense, single-state community hospital network spanning nine counties. Each hospital draws from a distinct patient population and sends patients to a partially overlapping, partially distinct set of SNF partners across the state.
Orlando Health’s geographic span across the Central Florida, Tampa Bay, and Alabama Baptist markets represents both a strategic complexity and a significant opportunity. The system’s hospitals serve distinct regional communities — from the eight-campus Orlando downtown flagship (ORMC + Arnold Palmer, Winnie Palmer, Dr. P. Phillips, Jewett Orthopedic, Cancer Institute Downtown, Horizon West, and Lake Mary), to Health Central in Ocoee, South Lake in Clermont, St. Cloud in Osceola County, Melbourne on the Space Coast, Sebastian River on the Treasure Coast, Bayfront in St. Petersburg, and the five Alabama Baptist Health hospitals in Alabaster, Jasper, Talladega, and Birmingham. This diversity means that post-acute discharge patterns, local SNF networks, and FSHR drivers differ meaningfully across facilities. A coordinated preferred-network framework delivers the greatest operational value precisely in this kind of heterogeneous multi-hospital system: unified performance standards, embedded clinical presence, and real-time visibility that operates consistently across all 12 hospitals regardless of geography.
Orlando Health Orlando Regional Medical Center’s 165-facility SNF destination network illustrates a pattern common to high-volume academic medical centers: a small number of facilities receive outsized volume, while the majority consist of lower-volume relationships that are difficult to manage systematically. This concentration and fragmentation dynamic — replicated across 12 hospitals and 188 SNF destinations — is the core visibility challenge at the heart of Orlando Health’s post-acute situation.
The concentration pattern at Orlando Health Orlando Regional Medical Center is characteristic of a large academic medical center in a geographically concentrated state. Its top SNF partners already have the volume to support an embedded clinical presence — and they clearly have established relationships with ORMC (Downtown Campus)’s discharge planning teams. The coordination gap lives in the long tail: the facilities receiving smaller patient volumes with no systematic performance framework or preferred-network accountability.
Multiplied across 12 Orlando Health hospitals and 188 total SNF destinations system-wide, that long tail represents hundreds of downstream facilities operating beyond the horizon of Orlando Health’s visibility. That is precisely the structural problem a unified preferred-network framework addresses — starting with the 77 cross-system facilities that already appear in multiple Orlando Health discharge networks simultaneously.
Florida state SNF utilization benchmark: 16.5% (CMS Medicare FFS Claims). The system-wide weighted-average FSHR of 42.1% serves as the primary internal reference point for identifying hospitals with elevated return-to-hospital rates and high-impact intervention opportunities across Orlando Health.
Orlando Health Orlando Regional Medical Center discharged 1,380 FFS patients to 165 distinct SNF destinations over the analysis period. FSHR stands at 43.2%, +1.1pp vs system average. The leading post-acute destination is Solaris Healthcare Windermere Llc (136 patients, 7.9% share). The hospital’s SNF network includes 18 facilityies with a “Very High” risk category.
The ORMC (Downtown Campus) post-acute network illustrates the broader Orlando Health pattern: a small number of high-volume SNF relationships account for the top discharge share, while the remaining volume is distributed across a long tail of facilities that operate without systematic performance oversight. A preferred-network framework anchored at ORMC (Downtown Campus)’s highest-volume destinations — with embedded clinical presence at the most critical facilities — would immediately extend coordinated care management across the majority of this hospital’s post-acute volume.
| Top SNF Partners | Pts | Share | FSHR | Risk |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Solaris Healthcare Windermere Llc | 136 | 7.9% | 42.0% | High |
| Delaney Park Health And Rehabilitation Center | 122 | 7.1% | 50.7% | High |
| Orlando Lutheran Towers Inc | 90 | 5.3% | 29.4% | High |
| Westminster Towers | 87 | 5.1% | 27.6% | High |
| Orlando Health & Rehabilitation Center | 85 | 5.0% | 59.8% | High |
Orlando Health South Lake Hospital discharged 436 FFS patients to 51 distinct SNF destinations over the analysis period. FSHR stands at 36.6%, -5.5pp vs system average. The leading post-acute destination is South Lake Hospital Inc (158 patients, 33.3% share). The hospital’s SNF network includes 15 facilityies with a “Very High” risk category.
The South Lake post-acute network illustrates the broader Orlando Health pattern: a small number of high-volume SNF relationships account for the top discharge share, while the remaining volume is distributed across a long tail of facilities that operate without systematic performance oversight. A preferred-network framework anchored at South Lake’s highest-volume destinations — with embedded clinical presence at the most critical facilities — would immediately extend coordinated care management across the majority of this hospital’s post-acute volume.
| Top SNF Partners | Pts | Share | FSHR | Risk |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| South Lake Hospital Inc | 158 | 33.3% | 28.1% | High |
| Clermont Snf Llc | 132 | 27.8% | 38.5% | High |
| Clermont Health And Rehabilitation Center | 87 | 18.4% | 50.2% | High |
| The Lakes Of Clermont Health And Rehabilitation Center | 33 | 7.0% | 34.4% | High |
| Health Central Park | 14 | 3.0% | — | High |
Orlando Health - Health Central Hospital discharged 332 FFS patients to 52 distinct SNF destinations over the analysis period. FSHR stands at 43.9%, +1.8pp vs system average. The leading post-acute destination is Lake Bennet Center For Rehabilitation And Healing (112 patients, 27.9% share). The hospital’s SNF network includes 18 facilityies with a “Very High” risk category.
The Health Central post-acute network illustrates the broader Orlando Health pattern: a small number of high-volume SNF relationships account for the top discharge share, while the remaining volume is distributed across a long tail of facilities that operate without systematic performance oversight. A preferred-network framework anchored at Health Central’s highest-volume destinations — with embedded clinical presence at the most critical facilities — would immediately extend coordinated care management across the majority of this hospital’s post-acute volume.
| Top SNF Partners | Pts | Share | FSHR | Risk |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lake Bennet Center For Rehabilitation And Healing | 112 | 27.9% | 44.2% | High |
| Health Central Park | 90 | 22.4% | 35.2% | High |
| Ocoee Fl Opco Llc | 37 | 9.2% | 56.0% | High |
| Winter Garden Rehabilitation And Nursing Center | 24 | 6.0% | 40.0% | High |
| Metro West Nursing & Rehab Center | 21 | 5.2% | 60.9% | High |
Orlando Health Bayfront Hospital discharged 328 FFS patients to 65 distinct SNF destinations over the analysis period. FSHR stands at 47.2%, +5.1pp vs system average. The leading post-acute destination is Westminster Suncoast (77 patients, 17.0% share). The hospital’s SNF network includes 18 facilityies with a “Very High” risk category.
The Bayfront post-acute network illustrates the broader Orlando Health pattern: a small number of high-volume SNF relationships account for the top discharge share, while the remaining volume is distributed across a long tail of facilities that operate without systematic performance oversight. A preferred-network framework anchored at Bayfront’s highest-volume destinations — with embedded clinical presence at the most critical facilities — would immediately extend coordinated care management across the majority of this hospital’s post-acute volume.
| Top SNF Partners | Pts | Share | FSHR | Risk |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Westminster Suncoast | 77 | 17.0% | 41.2% | High |
| Menorah Manor | 42 | 9.3% | 35.2% | High |
| Rk3, Llc | 35 | 7.7% | 35.3% | High |
| Gulf Shore Nursing And Rehab Llc | 29 | 6.4% | 54.5% | High |
| Bay Pointe Nursing Pavilion | 25 | 5.5% | 56.7% | High |
Orlando Health Melbourne Hospital discharged 205 FFS patients to 25 distinct SNF destinations over the analysis period. FSHR stands at 31.4%, -10.7pp vs system average. The leading post-acute destination is Melbourne Terrace Rehabilitation Center (53 patients, 23.3% share). The hospital’s SNF network includes 8 facilityies with a “Very High” risk category.
The Melbourne post-acute network illustrates the broader Orlando Health pattern: a small number of high-volume SNF relationships account for the top discharge share, while the remaining volume is distributed across a long tail of facilities that operate without systematic performance oversight. A preferred-network framework anchored at Melbourne’s highest-volume destinations — with embedded clinical presence at the most critical facilities — would immediately extend coordinated care management across the majority of this hospital’s post-acute volume.
| Top SNF Partners | Pts | Share | FSHR | Risk |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Melbourne Terrace Rehabilitation Center | 53 | 23.3% | 41.5% | Elevated |
| Indian River Center | 40 | 17.6% | 22.2% | High |
| Life Care Center Of Melbourne | 33 | 14.5% | 26.3% | Elevated |
| Viera Operating Investments Llc | 18 | 7.9% | — | Moderate |
| West Melbourne Health & Rehabilitation Center | 18 | 7.9% | — | Moderate |
Orlando Health St. Cloud Hospital discharged 173 FFS patients to 16 distinct SNF destinations over the analysis period. FSHR stands at 52.9%, +10.8pp vs system average. The leading post-acute destination is Solaris Healthcare Osceola (65 patients, 35.9% share). The hospital’s SNF network includes 6 facilityies with a “Very High” risk category.
The St. Cloud post-acute network illustrates the broader Orlando Health pattern: a small number of high-volume SNF relationships account for the top discharge share, while the remaining volume is distributed across a long tail of facilities that operate without systematic performance oversight. A preferred-network framework anchored at St. Cloud’s highest-volume destinations — with embedded clinical presence at the most critical facilities — would immediately extend coordinated care management across the majority of this hospital’s post-acute volume.
| Top SNF Partners | Pts | Share | FSHR | Risk |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Solaris Healthcare Osceola | 65 | 35.9% | 59.2% | High |
| Avante At St. Cloud, Inc. | 42 | 23.2% | 42.5% | High |
| Aviata At St. Cloud | 35 | 19.3% | 41.3% | High |
| The Terrace Of St Cloud | 31 | 17.1% | 67.1% | High |
| Delaney Park Health And Rehabilitation Center | <11 | — | — | Moderate |
Baptist Health Walker Hospital discharged 168 FFS patients to 18 distinct SNF destinations over the analysis period. FSHR stands at 34.0%, -8.1pp vs system average. The leading post-acute destination is Ridgeview Health Services, Inc. (63 patients, 35.0% share). The hospital’s SNF network includes 4 facilityies with a “Very High” risk category.
The Baptist Walker post-acute network illustrates the broader Orlando Health pattern: a small number of high-volume SNF relationships account for the top discharge share, while the remaining volume is distributed across a long tail of facilities that operate without systematic performance oversight. A preferred-network framework anchored at Baptist Walker’s highest-volume destinations — with embedded clinical presence at the most critical facilities — would immediately extend coordinated care management across the majority of this hospital’s post-acute volume.
| Top SNF Partners | Pts | Share | FSHR | Risk |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ridgeview Health Services, Inc. | 63 | 35.0% | 26.9% | Elevated |
| Ridgewood Health Services, Inc. | 41 | 22.8% | 31.5% | High |
| Cordova Health And Rehabilitation, Llc | 21 | 11.7% | 34.9% | High |
| Shadescrest Health Care Center | 16 | 8.9% | 54.5% | High |
| Hendrix Health & Rehabilitation | 15 | 8.3% | 29.3% | Elevated |
Orlando Health Sebastian River Hospital discharged 131 FFS patients to 19 distinct SNF destinations over the analysis period. FSHR stands at not available in this data period. The leading post-acute destination is Vero Beach Care Center (28 patients, 20.7% share). The hospital’s SNF network includes 2 facilityies with a “Very High” risk category.
The Sebastian River post-acute network illustrates the broader Orlando Health pattern: a small number of high-volume SNF relationships account for the top discharge share, while the remaining volume is distributed across a long tail of facilities that operate without systematic performance oversight. A preferred-network framework anchored at Sebastian River’s highest-volume destinations — with embedded clinical presence at the most critical facilities — would immediately extend coordinated care management across the majority of this hospital’s post-acute volume.
| Top SNF Partners | Pts | Share | FSHR | Risk |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vero Beach Care Center | 28 | 20.7% | — | High |
| Melbourne Terrace Rehabilitation Center | 22 | 16.3% | — | Elevated |
| Palm Bay Fl Opco Llc | 20 | 14.8% | — | Elevated |
| Life Care Center Of Palm Bay | 19 | 14.1% | — | Elevated |
| Sea Breeze Rehab And Nursing Center | 16 | 11.9% | — | Elevated |
Baptist Health Brookwood Hospital discharged 95 FFS patients to 54 distinct SNF destinations over the analysis period. FSHR stands at 33.9%, -8.2pp vs system average. The leading post-acute destination is Brookdale University Park Snf (Al) (32 patients, 17.1% share). The hospital’s SNF network includes 7 facilityies with a “Very High” risk category.
The Baptist Brookwood post-acute network illustrates the broader Orlando Health pattern: a small number of high-volume SNF relationships account for the top discharge share, while the remaining volume is distributed across a long tail of facilities that operate without systematic performance oversight. A preferred-network framework anchored at Baptist Brookwood’s highest-volume destinations — with embedded clinical presence at the most critical facilities — would immediately extend coordinated care management across the majority of this hospital’s post-acute volume.
| Top SNF Partners | Pts | Share | FSHR | Risk |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Brookdale University Park Snf (Al) | 32 | 17.1% | 28.1% | Moderate |
| Elite Nursing And Rehabilitation Care Center | 25 | 13.4% | 46.3% | High |
| Aspire Physical Recovery Center At Cahaba River, Llc | 23 | 12.3% | 21.7% | Elevated |
| Aspire Physical Recovery Center At Hoover, Llc | 15 | 8.0% | 44.2% | High |
| Arabella Health & Wellness Of Bessemer | <11 | — | — | Moderate |
Baptist Health Princeton Hospital discharged 84 FFS patients to 64 distinct SNF destinations over the analysis period. FSHR stands at 43.4%, +1.3pp vs system average. The leading post-acute destination is Arlington Rehabilitation& Healthcare Center (39 patients, 18.6% share). The hospital’s SNF network includes 11 facilityies with a “Very High” risk category.
The Baptist Princeton post-acute network illustrates the broader Orlando Health pattern: a small number of high-volume SNF relationships account for the top discharge share, while the remaining volume is distributed across a long tail of facilities that operate without systematic performance oversight. A preferred-network framework anchored at Baptist Princeton’s highest-volume destinations — with embedded clinical presence at the most critical facilities — would immediately extend coordinated care management across the majority of this hospital’s post-acute volume.
| Top SNF Partners | Pts | Share | FSHR | Risk |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Arlington Rehabilitation& Healthcare Center | 39 | 18.6% | 50.0% | High |
| Birmingham Nursing And Rehabilitation Center, Llc | 21 | 10.0% | 34.3% | High |
| Ridgeview Health Services, Inc. | 12 | 5.7% | 47.1% | High |
| Self Healthcare & Rehabilitation | 12 | 5.7% | 34.4% | Elevated |
| Anniston Health And Rehab Services | <11 | — | — | High |
Baptist Health Shelby Hospital discharged 59 FFS patients to 29 distinct SNF destinations over the analysis period. FSHR stands at 31.0%, -11.1pp vs system average. The leading post-acute destination is The Healthcare Center At Buck Creek (30 patients, 29.4% share). The hospital’s SNF network includes 11 facilityies with a “Very High” risk category.
The Baptist Shelby post-acute network illustrates the broader Orlando Health pattern: a small number of high-volume SNF relationships account for the top discharge share, while the remaining volume is distributed across a long tail of facilities that operate without systematic performance oversight. A preferred-network framework anchored at Baptist Shelby’s highest-volume destinations — with embedded clinical presence at the most critical facilities — would immediately extend coordinated care management across the majority of this hospital’s post-acute volume.
| Top SNF Partners | Pts | Share | FSHR | Risk |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Healthcare Center At Buck Creek | 30 | 29.4% | 28.8% | High |
| Shelby Ridge Nursing Home | 16 | 15.7% | 35.0% | High |
| Columbiana Health And Rehabilitation, Llc | 13 | 12.7% | — | High |
| Aliceville Manor Nursing Home, Inc. | <11 | — | — | Moderate |
| Arlington Rehabilitation& Healthcare Center | <11 | — | — | High |
Baptist Health Citizens Hospital discharged 27 FFS patients to 9 distinct SNF destinations over the analysis period. FSHR stands at 62.2%, +20.1pp vs system average. The leading post-acute destination is Talladega Healthcare Center, Inc. (27 patients, 58.7% share). The hospital’s SNF network includes 2 facilityies with a “Very High” risk category.
The Baptist Citizens post-acute network illustrates the broader Orlando Health pattern: a small number of high-volume SNF relationships account for the top discharge share, while the remaining volume is distributed across a long tail of facilities that operate without systematic performance oversight. A preferred-network framework anchored at Baptist Citizens’s highest-volume destinations — with embedded clinical presence at the most critical facilities — would immediately extend coordinated care management across the majority of this hospital’s post-acute volume.
| Top SNF Partners | Pts | Share | FSHR | Risk |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Talladega Healthcare Center, Inc. | 27 | 58.7% | 62.2% | High |
| Cleburne County Nursing Home | <11 | — | — | Moderate |
| Coosa Valley Healthcare Center Llc | <11 | — | — | High |
| Diversicare Of Oxford | <11 | — | — | High |
| Greenbriar At The Altamont | <11 | — | — | Moderate |
Of the 188 SNF destinations across the Orlando Health network, 77 already serve two or more Orlando Health hospitals simultaneously. These shared facilities are the structural backbone of any preferred-network strategy — existing relationships that can be elevated and formalized without requiring new partnerships to be built from scratch.
Solaris Healthcare Celebration is among the most connected SNFs in the Orlando Health network — serving 4 hospitals with 35 total patients. The other high-volume cross-system facilities represent the tier of shared relationships where a coordinated embedded clinical presence delivers immediate and demonstrable impact across multiple Orlando Health hospitals simultaneously.
Of particular note are cross-system facilities with elevated FSHR: SNFs that already appear in multiple Orlando Health discharge patterns are precisely the facilities where an embedded clinical presence and preferred-network performance standards create the accountability needed to drive measurable FSHR improvement across the system’s post-acute continuum.
The 77 cross-system facilities represent the natural starting cohort for a coordinated Orlando Health preferred network. A structured engagement beginning with these shared partners would immediately extend coverage across the broadest reach of Orlando Health hospitals and create the governance layer for performance tracking across the most consequential downstream relationships in the system.
The priority target analysis identifies SNFs with elevated FSHR rates, meaningful patient volume, and cross-hospital presence across the Orlando Health system. These facilities represent the intersection of high clinical risk and strategic leverage: where an embedded Puzzle clinical presence would deliver immediate impact across multiple Orlando Health hospitals simultaneously.
Orlando Health & Rehabilitation Center leads the priority target list with a priority score of 15.0 — an FSHR of 59.8% across 2 Orlando Health hospitals and 85 patients. The FSHR elevation at this facility — 17.7% above the system average — represents the type of high-volume, high-FSHR, multi-hospital relationship where an embedded Puzzle clinical presence delivers immediate and measurable return.
Together, the 15 priority targets cover relationships across the majority of Orlando Health’s active hospital portfolio. A coordinated engagement beginning with these facilities would immediately extend Puzzle’s embedded presence into the highest-risk corner of Orlando Health’s post-acute network — without requiring a facility-by-facility cold-call campaign. Orlando Health’s endorsement opens those doors, and Puzzle’s embedded clinical model provides the sustained presence to drive FSHR improvement over time.
Every active Orlando Health hospital is scored on a composite of discharge volume, destination breadth, FSHR elevation, and destination-level facility risk. The index surfaces relative priority — not a critique of any individual hospital’s care quality, but a guide to where systematic post-acute infrastructure delivers the greatest immediate return. FL state SNF utilization benchmark: 16.5% (FFS).
| Hospital | Beds | SNF Pts | Dests | FSHR % | Score | Priority |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Orlando Health South Lake Hospital | 170 | 436 | 51 | 36.6% | 65 | Immediate |
| Orlando Health Orlando Regional Medical Center | 808 | 1,380 | 165 | 43.2% | 61 | Immediate |
| Orlando Health Bayfront Hospital | 480 | 328 | 65 | 47.2% | 60 | Immediate |
| Orlando Health - Health Central Hospital | 252 | 332 | 52 | 43.9% | 59 | Immediate |
| Baptist Health Princeton Hospital | 505 | 84 | 64 | 43.4% | 59 | Immediate |
| Orlando Health Melbourne Hospital | 119 | 205 | 25 | 31.4% | 49 | Near-Term |
| Orlando Health St. Cloud Hospital | 84 | 173 | 16 | 52.9% | 48 | Near-Term |
| Baptist Health Brookwood Hospital | 595 | 95 | 54 | 33.9% | 48 | Near-Term |
| Baptist Health Citizens Hospital | 122 | 27 | 9 | 62.2% | 44 | Near-Term |
| Baptist Health Walker Hospital | 267 | 168 | 18 | 34.0% | 43 | Near-Term |
| Baptist Health Shelby Hospital | 252 | 59 | 29 | 31.0% | 43 | Near-Term |
| Orlando Health Sebastian River Hospital | 178 | 131 | 19 | — | 32 | Monitor |
Orlando Health South Lake Hospital leads the opportunity ranking with a score of 65 — driven primarily by its FSHR elevation and the breadth of its SNF destination network. A high-volume hospital with elevated FSHR and a large, largely unmanaged SNF network is precisely where a preferred-network infrastructure delivers maximum return on clinical investment.
Orlando Health Orlando Regional Medical Center (61 score, Immediate) and other Near-Term hospitals represent the tier where FSHR elevation merits structured attention. Their geographic position across the Orlando Health system means that a preferred-network framework anchored at the top hospitals naturally extends coverage to the Near-Term tier.
Puzzle Healthcare’s engagement model is built around one core insight: the most effective way to improve post-acute outcomes at a health system is to establish an embedded presence inside the SNF network itself. That requires the health system’s endorsement to open the door. When OSF HealthCare did exactly that, it changed the economics of the entire engagement.
The OSF Precedent — 29% to 9%: When OSF HealthCare partnered with Puzzle Healthcare, the system introduced Puzzle to approximately 60 nursing homes across their post-acute network. Puzzle’s embedded physician-led care model drove SNF 30-day readmissions across the network from 29% to 9% — a 20-percentage-point reduction that translated directly into fewer avoidable admissions, better STAR performance, and stronger downstream referral loyalty. That single act of health-system introduction — OSF telling its downstream SNF partners that Puzzle had the system’s trust and support — opened relationships that would have taken years to build through conventional vendor outreach.
Puzzle’s current partner footprint: Orlando Health would join a national footprint that includes OSF HealthCare, Corewell Health / Arvon, Piedmont Healthcare, Virginia Mason Franciscan Health (VMFH), CommonSpirit Health, and 100+ additional health-system and ACO partners across post-acute markets nationally. Orlando Health signals the priority; Puzzle owns the clinical execution.
Orlando Health has 188 unique SNF destinations — a network of meaningful scale across Central Florida, Tampa Bay, and Alabama Baptist markets. Orlando Health’s 77 cross-system shared facilities represent the natural introductions cohort: SNFs that already know and trust multiple Orlando Health hospitals, and where a coordinated Puzzle presence would have an immediate and demonstrable impact on FSHR performance. That is 77 introductions — many times the minimum needed to make the engagement economics work — before Puzzle has made a single cold call.
The engagement economics of Puzzle’s model require a minimum scale to be operationally viable: an embedded presence in a facility that receives only 8–10 patients per year cannot be sustained. Orlando Health’s cross-system SNF concentration solves this elegantly. The top cross-system facilities collectively receive enough volume across multiple Orlando Health hospitals to support a full embedded clinical program from day one — and their FSHR elevation makes the case for urgency clear.
The explicit ask mirrors the OSF model: Orlando Health introduces Puzzle to its downstream SNF partners — particularly the 77 cross-system facilities where the relationship already exists — so that Puzzle can establish a coordinated presence across the network. With OSF, 60 such introductions built the foundation for a system-wide preferred network. Orlando Health’s 77 cross-system facilities represent a comparable starting point, with a clear path to expanding across the full 188-destination network as the preferred-network framework matures.
The following sequence is designed to move efficiently from this initial analysis to a working preferred-network engagement, with no disruption to existing care pathways during the design phase.
Orlando Health has built one of Central Florida and adjacent Tampa Bay + Alabama Baptist markets’s most expansive community hospital networks, spanning 12 hospitals across a multi-state Central Florida + Alabama Baptist footprint. 3,418 FFS patients, 188 SNF destinations, 12 active hospitals, and 77 facilities already embedded in multiple Orlando Health care pathways simultaneously. That is not a system with a post-acute crisis. It is a system with a post-acute opportunity that has not yet been systematically activated.
Orlando Health’s 12-hospital post-acute network currently operates as 12 largely independent discharge patterns, each sending patients to their own set of SNF destinations without shared FSHR standards, systematic accountability, or a unified visibility layer connecting Orlando Health care teams to downstream SNF performance. The 15 priority SNF targets — facilities with FSHR rates significantly above the system average of 42.1% appearing across multiple Orlando Health hospitals — represent the highest-urgency intervention points. But they are part of a larger structural story: 188 SNF destinations, most operating beyond the horizon of Orlando Health’s systematic oversight.
The 77 cross-system SNFs — facilities that already serve multiple Orlando Health hospitals and have demonstrated their relevance to the system’s post-acute continuum — are the proof of concept. These are not hypothetical preferred partners; they are already functioning as the de facto preferred network across Central Florida, Tampa Bay, and Alabama Baptist markets. Puzzle’s role is to formalize it, extend it, and make FSHR performance systematically measurable and accountable.
The explicit ask: Introduce Puzzle to Orlando Health’s downstream SNF partners — beginning with the 77 cross-system facilities and 15 priority targets that already serve multiple hospitals — so that Puzzle can establish a coordinated embedded presence across the network. When OSF HealthCare made that introduction across approximately 60 nursing homes, the result was a system-wide preferred-network program built on existing trust. Orlando Health has the same structural foundation — at a scale that makes the opportunity commensurately significant for the Central Florida, Tampa Bay, and Alabama Baptist markets.
We look forward to the conversation — and to what Orlando Health’s post-acute program looks like with the visibility, FSHR accountability, and coordination infrastructure to match the system’s clinical ambition across Central Florida, Tampa Bay, and Alabama Baptist markets.